Nissenbaum paper recycles claims on wind energy and health already found inadequate by courts and expert panel




Much of the information contained in the recently published paper, "Effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep and health" by Michael A Nissenbaum, Jeffery J Aramini, and Christopher D Hanning (all directors/ scientific advisors for the Society for Wind Vigilance), was previously reviewed and considered by experts at the first Environmental Review Tribunal (Erikson v. MOE 2011) hearing on wind energy in Ontario and in the Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan case McKinnon v. Martin (Red Lily Legal Case in 2010).

The Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) and the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) jointly commissioned experts to conduct a scientific critique of this now published paper. The review by Intrinsik Environmental Sciences has identified "concerns related to study design, methodology, sample size and administration of questionnaires to participants."

Click here to view CanWEA’s news release.

Click here to view the Intrinsik critique.  

See also CanWEA’s new Wind is Powerful Video and new The Secret Is Out. Wind Is In. Brochure